|
Post by ScoobyAddict on Aug 22, 2012 16:20:31 GMT -5
I am not against it, but I do think they should be contacted first AND we need to check their last login date. Maybe they are just lurkers.
|
|
|
Post by Doo on Aug 22, 2012 16:22:27 GMT -5
I can look at the login dates tommorow. I think anyone who hasn't logged in for a year should be sent an email. Sound fair?
|
|
|
Post by ScoobyAddict on Aug 22, 2012 16:24:22 GMT -5
Yeah, that sounds fair!!
|
|
|
Post by Doo on Aug 22, 2012 16:24:53 GMT -5
OK, I'll check them out tommorow.
|
|
|
Post by Doo on Aug 22, 2012 20:13:23 GMT -5
Checked it out now, and there are A LOT of members who haven't been on in a year. This'll take a long time!
|
|
|
Post by Doo on Aug 22, 2012 20:13:37 GMT -5
Btw, now we have 187 members.
|
|
|
Post by Doo on Aug 22, 2012 20:14:23 GMT -5
I think it's kind of amazing we got 7 more members within two weeks. This forum must be popular!
|
|
|
Post by laescoobyfan on Aug 22, 2012 20:14:47 GMT -5
Checked it out now, and there are A LOT of members who haven't been on in a year. This'll take a long time! You're just doing the ones with 0 posts right?
|
|
|
Post by laescoobyfan on Aug 22, 2012 20:16:07 GMT -5
I think it's kind of amazing we got 7 more members within two weeks. This forum must be popular! Yea, it seems like for a time there, new members started showing up.
|
|
|
Post by Doo on Aug 22, 2012 21:30:22 GMT -5
So many members who haven't been on here in so long! I sent emails to 18 members tonight. A few of them haven't been on since 2009!
|
|
|
Post by Doo on Aug 22, 2012 21:30:56 GMT -5
Checked it out now, and there are A LOT of members who haven't been on in a year. This'll take a long time! You're just doing the ones with 0 posts right? Yes, but a few who haven't posted for 3 years also got emails. Don't worry, their posts won't be deleted, even if their account is deleted.
|
|
|
Post by ScoobyAddict on Aug 22, 2012 21:32:06 GMT -5
We can divide them up if you want. Or we just leave them as is! Them being members isn't hurting anything! Or we delete anyone with 0 posts who hasn't logged on in a year!
|
|
|
Post by laescoobyfan on Aug 22, 2012 22:34:00 GMT -5
If any are going to be deleted, I think only deleting the ones with 0 posts is best.
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on Aug 22, 2012 23:14:03 GMT -5
Personally I find a site with under 500 members inactive. If we were to delete all with 0 posts that haven't been on in a year the site would like have no members. I mean there is only like 40 or 50 that post and are active if that.
|
|
|
Post by laescoobyfan on Aug 22, 2012 23:19:02 GMT -5
Personally I find a site with under 500 members inactive. If we were to delete all with 0 posts that haven't been on in a year the site would like have no members. I mean there is only like 40 or 50 that post and are active if that. The people with 0 posts are not being active, so why would it make the forum less active if those members are deleted?
|
|