|
Post by russm on May 3, 2016 6:15:23 GMT -5
It's kinda tiring hearing about Shaggy being the medicated one. I hope we get beyond that parody view of him, because that's just a specific view that some people get from him when they're too ignorant to know any different. He neither looks nor sounds medicated in the few pages we see and given who he works for it may not be thank kind of medication. It could be drugs to give him/control specific abilities or, he might just have a cold.
|
|
|
Post by scoobypediapossible on May 3, 2016 6:28:55 GMT -5
It's kinda tiring hearing about Shaggy being the medicated one. I hope we get beyond that parody view of him, because that's just a specific view that some people get from him when they're too ignorant to know any different. He neither looks nor sounds medicated in the few pages we see and given who he works for it may not be thank kind of medication. It could be drugs to give him/control specific abilities or, he might just have a cold. I was specifically talking about TV Guide's view of the characters, which is just the way the general public would view them. And I get that, but there's more too them than that (when they're written right). You're right, though, about the comic neither making him sound or look medicated.
|
|
|
Post by scoobypediapossible on May 3, 2016 6:30:41 GMT -5
He neither looks nor sounds medicated in the few pages we see and given who he works for it may not be thank kind of medication. It could be drugs to give him/control specific abilities or, he might just have a cold. I was specifically talking about TV Guide's view of the characters, which is just the way the general public would view them. And I get that, but there's more too them than that (when they're written right). You're right, though, about the comic neither making him sound or look medicated. I did find it funny at first. But then it's like, "Yeah, I get. Shaggy is a stoner", now let's just move on.
|
|
|
Post by Soupperson on May 3, 2016 15:24:10 GMT -5
It's kinda tiring hearing about Shaggy being the medicated one. I hope we get beyond that parody view of him, because that's just a specific view that some people get from him when they're too ignorant to know any different. You have a problem with this description and not Fred being the hunky one? At least Shaggy's suggests the idea of a personality. The comics for teens I doubt we'll get any drug usage and if we do I'll join your side.
|
|
|
Post by slicknickshady on May 3, 2016 16:32:44 GMT -5
T can have implied Sex. But other than that no drugs. A lot of my comics are E. Once in a while certain issues are T. But i don't think you have to worry about drugs or Sex. haha. I'm just saying you can get implied. But i can't recall the last comic i bought that implied sex and i buy comics every week so don't be stressing over my implied sex statement.
And i think i just set the record for most times using "Implied Sex" in a post. haha.
|
|
|
Post by scoobypediapossible on May 3, 2016 17:28:56 GMT -5
It's kinda tiring hearing about Shaggy being the medicated one. I hope we get beyond that parody view of him, because that's just a specific view that some people get from him when they're too ignorant to know any different. You have a problem with this description and not Fred being the hunky one? At least Shaggy's suggests the idea of a personality. The comics for teens I doubt we'll get any drug usage and if we do I'll join your side. I mean in general. I thought TV Guide's description was a generalisation of them. And people think Shaggy is a pothead. I can see that the way Matthew Lillard portrays him, even in the cartoons, but with Be Cool and LEGO, I see him more than that.
|
|
|
Post by russm on May 3, 2016 17:35:45 GMT -5
T can have implied Sex. But other than that no drugs. A lot of my comics are E. Once in a while certain issues are T. But i don't think you have to worry about drugs or Sex. haha. I'm just saying you can get implied. But i can't recall the last comic i bought that implied sex and i buy comics every week so don't be stressing over my implied sex statement. And i think i just set the record for most times using "Implied Sex" in a post. haha. If it is written well then you shouldn't need either, especially explicitly. Relying on either shows a lack of creativity. We'll have to see how it goes, it might turn up, but should be a consequence of the plot not shoe-horned in just for the sake of it.
|
|
|
Post by slicknickshady on May 3, 2016 23:27:30 GMT -5
T can have implied Sex. But other than that no drugs. A lot of my comics are E. Once in a while certain issues are T. But i don't think you have to worry about drugs or Sex. haha. I'm just saying you can get implied. But i can't recall the last comic i bought that implied sex and i buy comics every week so don't be stressing over my implied sex statement. And i think i just set the record for most times using "Implied Sex" in a post. haha. If it is written well then you shouldn't need either, especially explicitly. Relying on either shows a lack of creativity. We'll have to see how it goes, it might turn up, but should be a consequence of the plot not shoe-horned in just for the sake of it. I would agree. Even as a big Fraphne fan like myself.. There's no need for it in this story looking at it from the outside right now. Like say in issue 3 when they spend the night in the ghost town. They likely won't even make the sleeping arrangements clear in the story.
|
|
|
Post by slicknickshady on May 7, 2016 16:55:26 GMT -5
For those who care you can now see what the blank variant looks like. I mean it's what you expect but still. Haha.
|
|
|
Post by russm on May 7, 2016 17:40:59 GMT -5
Smartdog prototype... There's more to Scooby than meets the eye it seems.
|
|
|
Post by scoobypediapossible on May 8, 2016 8:30:49 GMT -5
The adult colouring book is just Jim Lee's own un-inked version, which was shown months ago.
|
|
|
Post by scoobypediapossible on May 8, 2016 8:33:33 GMT -5
Did the knitting channel replace YouTube?
|
|
|
Post by russm on May 8, 2016 9:31:45 GMT -5
The adult colouring book is just Jim Lee's own un-inked version, which was shown months ago. Is that just the cover or is the entire comic uninked?
|
|
|
Post by russm on May 8, 2016 9:32:49 GMT -5
Did the knitting channel replace YouTube? It sounds like a networked TV channel (like Discovery, SciFi etc).
|
|
|
Post by scoobypediapossible on May 8, 2016 10:21:24 GMT -5
The adult colouring book is just Jim Lee's own un-inked version, which was shown months ago. Is that just the cover or is the entire comic uninked? I imagine just the cover.
|
|