|
|
Post by barneynedward on Feb 5, 2017 22:10:12 GMT -5
I've heard of cases where the older twin is referred to as the big sibling and the younger as the little one. Madelyn and Velma seem to be very close in age.
|
|
|
|
Post by candy1026 on Feb 5, 2017 23:08:53 GMT -5
Eh, could be...
|
|
|
|
Post by scoobnick on Feb 6, 2017 0:01:01 GMT -5
no, they are cousins, so they cannot be twins.
|
|
|
|
Post by russm on Feb 6, 2017 1:52:12 GMT -5
no, they are cousins, so they cannot be twins. No, they are sisters. That's what they say in Abracadabra Doo. |
|
|
|
Post by barneynedward on Feb 19, 2017 17:34:17 GMT -5
no, they are cousins, so they cannot be twins. No, they are sisters. That's what they say in Abracadabra Doo. What's your vote russm? |
|
|
|
Post by russm on Feb 19, 2017 18:09:24 GMT -5
No, they are sisters. That's what they say in Abracadabra Doo. What's your vote russm? It's a no. At no point in the film is there any indication that they are twins. Velma refers to Madelyn as her little sister while Madelyn calls Velma her big sister, something I contend that twins would not do. |
|
|
|
Post by scoobnick on Feb 19, 2017 18:54:38 GMT -5
twins is very unlikely. i sense theres is at least a years age difference between velma and Madelyn. twins would be born within hours, minutes or seconds of each other. this is not the case with these two.
|
|
|
|
Post by candy1026 on Feb 19, 2017 21:55:51 GMT -5
Good point. I am a twin (The older one) And my sister HATES being referred as the little one. Although people do call us by older and younger. (It helps that she really does look younger then me) I suppose it's possible Madelyn wouldn't mind, maybe, maybe not.
|
|
